Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Scott Lewis's avatar

You say this in this posting

Block - and my entire career - wouldn’t have been possible without the open infrastructure that others chose to build. Every system my coworkers and I built, every product we shipped, ran on foundations that existed because someone, years earlier, chose sharing over rent-seeking and control.

Then you articulate rationales such as

https://github.com/aaif/project-proposals/issues/8#issuecomment-4365381152

...which is just an inaccurate and a shallow assessment of the proposal...see subsequent comments (of course ignored/not responded to by you or anyone).

To many of us with actual OSS project leadership/maintenance and Foundation creation and governance experience (e.g. myself and other proposal authors) this seems to be a familiar choosing of rent-seeking, OSS project exploitation, and BDFL-governance (known together as organization capture)...in stunning contradiction to the OSS ecosystem 'gratitude' you imply in the above paragraph.

I didn't think Foundation-level capture could occur before the organization was actually up and running. Seems I was wrong.

No posts

Ready for more?